Skip to content
Pre-order BookBook a Consultation

Separate the purposes

Make your crawler rules a deliberate choice.

AI search, model training and user-requested retrieval are different activities. Compare the robots.txt rules declared for your page path and understand the limits of those controls.

Compare crawler rules

AI Crawler Access Checker

Test the path you actually care about.

Enter a public page URL. The tool fetches that origin’s robots.txt and evaluates nine named tokens against the path and query. It does not fetch the page itself or impersonate those bots.

01 / Check a page path

Who can use your content?

Compare declared robots.txt rules for nine search, training, content-use and user-requested retrieval tokens.

What this check covers

We fetch the origin’s robots.txt using our own user agent, with up to five redirects, a 20-second request budget and a 500 KiB file limit. The page URL supplies the path to test; we do not fetch the page or impersonate provider bots.

This checks declared rules, not firewall access or AI visibility. Some user-requested fetchers may ignore robots.txt. Google-Extended is a content-use control, not a separate crawler. No AI API key is needed. Requests share the existing link-check allowance.

02 / Separate the purposes

Your crawler report

Enter a public URL to compare crawler rules.

Plain-text report

Check page-level indexing signals separately with the Indexability Checker.

Put it to work

Start with the purpose, then read the rule.

A single “AI allowed” label would hide important differences. The report separates four categories so you can review each deliberately.

Search

Discovery for search experiences

Read the search-token results separately from training tokens. An allowed rule does not guarantee retrieval or inclusion in an answer.

Training

Potential use in model development

Review the relevant training-token declarations. This report cannot show whether content was used historically or undo past use.

Content-use control

A control is not always a separate crawler

Google-Extended is a content-use control, not a separate HTTP crawler. Do not read its result as a Google Search indexing decision.

User-requested retrieval

A person asks a service to fetch something

Provider behaviour varies. Some user-requested fetchers may not apply robots.txt rules, so a matching disallow is not proof of enforced access.

Illustrative example

Search and training can have different rules.

Illustrative OpenAI token example, not a universal policy recommendation. Review your full robots.txt file and current provider documentation before changing it.

User-agent: OAI-SearchBot
Allow: /

User-agent: GPTBot
Disallow: /

OAI-SearchBot

Search rule: allow

The search token has its own group. This permission does not promise citations or answer placement.

GPTBot

Training rule: disallow

The training token has a separate declaration. This is not evidence about historical use of your content.

The report evaluates declared rules. To understand actual requests, check server logs, access controls and provider guidance separately.

Before you move on

From a rule to a policy you understand.

  1. Review the exact origin and path

    Subdomains, schemes and paths matter. Test the specific public URL rather than assuming one homepage result describes every resource.

  2. Read the selected group and matching rule

    A named group is evaluated separately from the wildcard fallback. The report shows which rule was selected for the entered path.

  3. Verify actual access separately

    A firewall can block a permitted crawler; some retrieval services may not apply robots.txt. Review logs and access controls alongside the declared preference.

Your questions

Rules are one part of the picture.

Will allowing a search bot make my business appear in AI answers?

No. This report does not measure AI visibility, indexing, citations or rankings. It checks the declared robots.txt rules for the entered path.

Why is a result labelled Unknown?

A failed, missing or ambiguous robots.txt response does not produce a reliable permission conclusion here. Read the fetch finding and confirm provider handling separately.

Does this send my page to an AI model?

No AI API key is needed. The checker retrieves robots.txt using its own user agent and evaluates the rules. It does not send the page to an AI model.

Can robots.txt protect private content?

It is not authentication or an access-control barrier. Keep private resources behind appropriate access controls; a disallow rule is not a substitute.

Need a clearer policy across your website?

We can help review crawler declarations alongside your content goals, technical setup and actual request evidence—without treating access permission as a promise of visibility.

Send an enquiry

Let’s talk

Start the conversation.

Your details will be used to respond to your enquiry. Privacy policy

The Margarita Funnel

Your cart 0

Loading your cart…